Features of Group Discussion

FEATURES OF GROUP DISCUSSION

"Features" refer to the distinctive attributes, characteristics, or aspects of something. When discussing the features of a particular object, concept, or process, we are identifying and describing the key elements that define it and distinguish it from other things. In the context of group discussions, for instance, features might include the structure of the discussion, the roles of participants, the methods of communication, and the processes used for decision-making. These features collectively shape how the group discussion is conducted and how effective it is in achieving its objectives. So, here we would have a look at the features that a group discussion possess…

1. Complexity: Communication among group members is more complex than two-person communication. It is hard enough for one person to tune in to the communicative signals of just another person, and this process is complicated tremendously by the addition of even one additional person. Add several others, as in the typical five-to eight-person small group, and the process can lead to information overload.

2. Having a Common and clear Purpose -An important purpose for communicating in a group is to get things done, to accomplish tasks. Thus when we talk in organizational context, every group discussion in formal setting has a purpose. The participants need to know the purpose of the group discussion so that they can concentrate during the discussion and contribute to achieving the group goal. An effective group discussion typically begins with a purpose stated by the initiator.

3. Informality: Small group communication is spontaneous and casual. Although group members may decide in advance what topics they want to bring up or mentally rehearse what they want to say about them, usually they do not plan the exact wording. In addition, it is not possible to predict exactly how others in the group will respond. Thus, in contrast to public speaking, it is less possible to foresee the outcome of a small group discussion.

4. Interchange of speaker/listener roles - In Group communication, the roles of primary sender and primary receiver alternate frequently. For example, Person 1 makes a suggestion to his fellow group members. His remarks will be short in comparison to most speeches. After he finishes (or maybe even before he's done), Person 2 responds verbally and Person 1  becomes the receiver. The roles of sender/receiver shift quickly among members.

5. Immediacy of feedback - Immediacy of feedback is a crucial aspect of group discussions, as it allows participants to quickly gauge the reactions and thoughts of their peers. This rapid exchange of information helps facilitate understanding and collaboration. In this scenario, each group member offers immediate feedback, both verbal and nonverbal, contributing to a dynamic and interactive discussion. This immediacy of feedback allows for real-time adjustments and refinements to ideas, enhancing the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the group discussion process.

6. Creation of outcomes - In a small group setting, the creation of outcomes is a collective responsibility shared equally by all members. Each participant's contributions directly influence the final result, making the outcome a product of their combined efforts and interactions. The final outcome, therefore, is not solely the result of any single individual's input but rather the culmination of what all group members said and did during the discussion. This collaborative process ensures that all participants have an equal stake in the outcome. Their shared responsibility promotes active engagement, accountability, and a sense of ownership over the decisions and solutions generated by the group.

To Conclude, Group discussions are characterized by their complexity due to the multitude of communicative signals among members, often leading to information overload. They are driven by a clear purpose, especially in formal settings, where understanding and focusing on the group's goal is crucial. Such discussions are typically informal and spontaneous, with unpredictable outcomes. The roles of speaker and listener frequently interchange, allowing dynamic and responsive interactions. Immediacy of feedback is a vital feature, enabling quick reactions and facilitating real-time adjustments and refinements to ideas. Ultimately, the creation of outcomes in a small group is a collective effort, with all members equally responsible for and engaged in the final results, fostering a sense of shared ownership and accountability. There are certain other features of Group Discussion which include Motivated Interaction among all members, it demands Logical Presentation of ideas, opinion and point of view and Coardial Atmosphere encourages maximum participation of members.